Saturday, March 29, 2008

Being Lazy

Being lazy, I'm going to reproduce a comment I made on another website. You can read the full context here. I have a problem with Geert Wilder's new film 'Fitna' condemning Islam. Everytime I find a new link to the film, it gets cut off, so I can't offer you a link. But it's probably the most offensive thing I've ever seen. Islam most surely has it's problems and I should do a post about that, but taking random quotes out of context from the Quran and claiming that it means that all Muslims are evil is inflammatory at best. Nevertheless, I support Mr. Wilder's right to have his say. Unfortunately, not everyone agrees. But I do get to have my say, but I'll warn people that I condemn violence regardless of who it's committed by. And no religion gets a pass, not even my own. Although Judaism only gets condemned by inference. So anyone who wants to accuse me of anti-semitism, understand that they got treated better than everyone else (and on purpose). But it's not the Likud line, so I guess I'm evil. As for it being anti-Christian, well, I think the actions of Christians in the past are not consistent with the message of Jesus. But they are consistent with the message of the Book of Revelations (and Joshua). Christians should decide which side they're on. I'm with Jesus, but I'm not a Christian, so it doesn't matter. I'll add that I don't believe that any religion needs to tear out pages of their respective texts (unlike Wilder, who is adamant about HIS right to free speech, but not anyone else's) . Here it is (with some spelling corrections):

If you think that’s violent, read the Book of Joshua. A clearer endorsement of genocide cannot be found. And when we look at history, it’s clear that the Christians took the message of genocide to heart. Here in America, the Christian colonists not only acted out the message, but upscaled it Cecil B. DeMille style.

Before Mr. Wilders asks Muslims to tear out the offending passages of the Quran, he should tear the Book of Joshua out of his Bible. And he shouldn’t stop there. The Book of Revelations is even worse (and considered to be a war plan by many Christians, most notably John Hagee). And there are passages in Exodus (also repeated in the Quran) that really should go too, like the actions of the Sons of Levi, which are an obvious endorsement of genocide against Hindus.

Look, if the Muslims had any real power, I might be worried, but they don’t. The Christians have long been the dominant military force on the planet. Just look at a map of the world in 1916. The Christians controlled the entire world except for Japan, Thailand, Iran, and Turkey (Ottoman Empire, sort of). Their domination was very nearly complete. And these people want to recreate the story of the Book of Revelations.

I’m neither a Christian (who’d have guessed?) or a Muslim. And the Muslims have always treated my religion far worse than they ever treated the Christians (unless you consider higher taxes to be a fate worse than death, which those of my religion received). So I have every reason to be concerned about Islam. But the Book of Revelations promises me an equally horrible fate, and those who believe it are far more powerful and dangerous than the Muslims will ever be.

This is why McCain’s desire to have John Hagee’s endorsement bothers me so much. He could be given the military might to carry out the Book of Revelations and seems to agree with Hagee that it should be carried out.

A few months ago, I saw the most powerful speech of my life. It was the Dalai Lama’s warm-up act for the dedication of the new Drepung Loseling monastery in Mundgod, India. And it was given by the Hindu guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar. The speech was about the need to confront religious extremism and ‘communalism’ everywhere it exists and regardless of which religion it comes from. It was made all the more powerful by the Dalai Lama’s presence behind him. The religions of the world can come together. But it won’t happen until we confront the extremists within our own ranks. Surely Islam needs to do this, but Christianity needs to do it as well. Even my religion, Buddhism, needs to do it, as evidenced by the appalling behavior of some of the rioters in Lhasa. To his credit, the Dalai Lama did condemn the violence, just as Sri Sri Ravi Shankar condemns the violence committed against Muslims by his fellow Hindus. Unfortunately, the Abrahamic religions seem caught up in Old Testament hatred, which blinds them to their misdeeds.

2 comments:

Vox said...

Having no real religion but whatever is Nature, I find any sort of dogma besides science extremely scary in a sociological context.

If one of us appeared with all our electronic and weapons accoutrements to the neanderthal man, would we appear to be gods?

Some day, our mastery over science and nature may make us omnipotent, and immortal. Would we be gods then?

Perhaps, but right now we're shooting at each other with Ak 47s and M 16s. Who cares? The omnipotent sky-wizard? I haven't seen him show up yet, and when he does, I'll be wondering about where he keeps his time machine.

All the dissension on this planet we have can be eliminated with the touch of a lover, the first recognition of a parent by a child, or the gratitude of a saved victim.

Before co-opting ourselves to a side, let's keep in mind that there is no sides but life and the appreciation of it, which is what I believe most religions espouse anyway.

Pete

Where Am I? said...

Sorry about the late response, I've been super busy (I'm just taking a break now)

"If one of us appeared with all our electronic and weapons accoutrements to the neanderthal man, would we appear to be gods?"

The Book of Ezekiel might offer that answer. The way the angels appear to Ezekiel is really strange in that book. It seems closer to an alien abduction than a normal religious experience. Granted, I find that very implausible as well, but it is notable. He certainly thought they were gods, but to the modern reader, they seem more like an advanced civilization.

"All the dissension on this planet we have can be eliminated with the touch of a lover, the first recognition of a parent by a child, or the gratitude of a saved victim."

Wow! That's beautiful. I always knew you could write. There's nothing to add there.